Common corruption risks in the health sector

Key takeaways of this simplified differentiation between the two types of health systems: 

First, corruption tends to be found where money is to be made. Therefore, the financing of health services is critical to understand and address. A system’s mechanisms greatly impact its vulnerability to corruption.

Second, healthcare systems are complex structures. It is therefore vital to gain a thorough understanding of an individual healthcare system in order to design adequate anti-corruption measures. 

 

Table 2.1 Relation between the different financing mechanisms and the risk of corruption

Financing (46) Characteristics Corruption risk
Taxes Normally associated with free or almost free service deliveries  Large-scale diversions of public funds at ministerial level. High risk of informal or illegal payments. Corruption in procurement. Abuses that undermine the quality of services.
Social insurance Compulsory, not every citizen elegible for coverage, premiums and benefits described in social contracts (laws or regulations). Only applicable for formal employees.  Most common abuses include excessive medical treatment, fraud in billing, and diversion of funds.
Private insurance  Buyer voluntarily purchases insurance (can be done on individual or group basis). Problem of risk selection (selecting healthy people). Same as for public insurance schemes.
Out-of-pocket payments When patients pay providers directly out of their own pockets for goods and services. Costs are not reimbursable. No guarantee that all health services are of value to those buying them. With weak regulatory capacity there is a high risk of overcharging and inappropriate use of services.

 Source (accessed August 6th, 2012). EC 2013: 26 (also Vian/Nordberg 2008, taken from Savedoff 2003). 

 

For instance, the above table, Relation between the different financing mechanisms and the risk of corruption, provides a more detailed illustration of financing mechanisms and their impact on corruption.