Author

News,

NEW PUBLICATION: Revised Guidance on REDD+ Corruption Risk Assessments

A revised Guidance on Conducting REDD+ Corruption Risk Assessments is now available. The first version of this Guidance was released in December 2012. The Guidance was revised in December 2013 to (a) build on the results and lessons learned from the pilots in Bangladesh, DRC, Kenya, Peru and the Philippines; (b) delineate and provide clearer guidance on two distinct but correlated aspects: corruption factors that enable or accelerate deforestation and forest degradation, and new corruption risks brought about by REDD+; and, (c) include practical “tip boxes”, for example on understanding types and forms of corruption, finding entry points for anti-corruption work in an RPP or a national REDD+ strategy, appreciating the value of gender disaggregated data, and handling sensitive issues.
 
Access the revised Guidance online here.

News,

E-Discussion Summary Report available: “Judicial Integrity: Assessing Challenges & Results of Capacity Dev’t Interventions”

The consolidated report of an e-discussion on “Judicial Integrity — Assessing Challenges and Results of Capacity Development Interventions” is now available.

The e-discussion took place from 4 November to 3 December 2013. It had two phases:

Phase I – Stocktaking of Judicial Integrity Programmes

  • Are there public surveys or expert reports available on the performance of the judiciary? If so, what do they tell about people’s perception with regards to the fair and equal delivery of justice?
  • What are good examples of enhancing judicial integrity? What was their impact?
  • Have the Bangalore Principles or UNCAC’s requirements been instrumental in judicial reform projects and in what form? What evidence exists on its impact?
  • What are the bottlenecks to engage with development projects that address judicial independence and integrity?

Phase II – Identifying Indicators of Judicial Integrity

  • What are existing monitoring mechanisms and indicators of judicial capacity and integrity?
  • In what ways have the Bangalore Principles or United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) requirements already been used as an evaluative framework to measure judicial integrity?
  • How can we increase the evidence base on the impact of judicial capacity and integrity initiatives on corruption prevention?

The e-discussion was organized by UNDP’s Democratic Governance Group, Bureau of Development Policy (BDP), in partnership with the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre at the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and the Asia-Pacific Integrity in Action Network (AP-INTACT).

Please click here for a PDF of the summary.

News,

Thailand’s anti-corruption network gets UNDP backing

Thailand’s Anti-Corruption Network, a private sector group led by a consortium of Thai businessmen and more than 30 industry associations, signed a partnership declaration with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The new partnership aims to promote regular dialogue and strategy on fighting corruption, the development of public advocacy campaigns, and knowledge sharing in raising public awareness and building capacity of organisations within the expanding network.
 
Read the story in The Nation.

News,

Nepal: Partnering to enhance anti-corruption efforts

In Nepal, it is estimated that corruption accounts for losses up to USD 3.3 billion. This has resulted in many development resources being diverted away from their intended beneficiaries, thereby elevating the cost of living. According to Transparency International, the cost of water in Nepal is 30 percent higher due to corruption, while general products cost on average 20 percent more than they should.

In light of the growing concern from both the Government of Nepal and civil society, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC) jointly organised a ‘Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge (PACK)’ training with the aim to improve the knowledge and understanding of the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) amongst Government officials and the donor community.

The UNCAC is a global legally binding international instrument against corruption. It was formally adopted in 2003, and currently 171 parties are signatories to the convention. The UNCAC sets out to prevent and combat corruption and offers technical assistance in international cooperation and asset recovery. The Convention also outlines the role of civil society in countering corruption. 

Nepal ratified the convention in 2011 and has since been proactively involved in strengthening national legislation in accordance with the UNCAC. Currently, the National Strategy and Plan of Actions on anti-corruption includes 13 sub-strategies and upwards of 173 activities in the area of anti-corruption. Around 23 laws are also being considered for amendment, while eight laws are awaiting enactment. In an effort to further the national momentum on anti-corruption, the PACK training delivered by UNODC and UNDP brought together Representatives from the Government of Nepal and from the donor community, including Representatives from the World Bank, Norwegian Embassy, Department for International Development (DFID)- United Kingdom, Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other agencies. 

During the interactive training, the two groups were led into discussions around how they would seek to improve the environment in which anti-corruption activities take place. This activity brought forward ideas and concepts that reflected both the wishes and priority concerns of the participants. Some of the suggestions brought forward were (i) a concerted effort needs to be made to consolidate the various anti-corruption agencies and government entities, with the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA) as the lead agency to coordinate and consolidate anti-corruption efforts in the country, (ii) establish and strengthen regional judiciaries and courts to alleviate the stress on the central authority, (iii) maintain and improve the rule of law within the country, to provide for a stronger foundation for development activities and (iv) improve efforts to help the Government of Nepal in developing process and result oriented programming. 

The donor community too put forward their perspective and concerns regarding anti-corruption activities in the county. They felt that criminalization of corruption in all sectors is important, as development efforts are not confined to public works and involve private sector actors as well. They also felt that in order to counter corruption it is crucial to have judicial independence, along with an active and free civil society.

The workshop concluded that a joint partnership on anti-corruption efforts should focus on (i) increasing the capacity of staff within anti-corruption organizations in order to focus on the core strategies of punitive and preventative functions, (ii) increasing interaction with the private sector, civil society and the media to sensitize them on anti-corruption issues, (iii) creation of a working group, in order to facilitate better coordination and interaction amongst stakeholders, (iv) developing a coordination mechanism for government agencies and (v) reviewing  the national strategy and providing a consolidated singular action plan to replace the multitude of other independently developed strategies and action plans.

This was the first-ever country level training in Nepal for both government and donors on Partnering in Anti-Corruption Knowledge. The discussions encouraged dialogue and a sharing of ideas between two critical anti – corruption stakeholders in the country – the Government and the donor community – and paved the way towards developing concrete proposals in the spirit of partnership.

The training was conducted under the UNODC led project titled, ‘Joint Action towards a Global Regime against Corruption’ with financial support from the Government of Australia.

Click here to read the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)

News,

Addressing gender equality related corruption risks and vulnerabilities in civil service methodology

Central and Eastern Europe have made considerable gains in the area of good governance, but have not achieved equal opportunities for men and women employed within the civil service.
Political and public institutions remain deeply entrenched in patriarchal culture; women play a marginal role in public decision-making; and public administration institutions do not provide sufficient incentives to create a female-friendly work environment.
While Central and Eastern European citizens can tackle government corruption in a number of ways, this survey methodology provides a first step: working with civil servants to ensure more transparent operations within the civil service.
This methodology is designed as a resource for understanding and contributing to current research on gender and corruption within the civil service and as a practical toolkit for implementing a survey on perceptions and experiences of gender, transparency and corruption.
Published by: UNDP in Europe and Central Asia on May 06, 2014